…to the right decision after their lengthy deliberations. I hope Professor David also plans to correct this error in the other paper for which he was a senior author. Perhaps now…
…are the quotes that made it into the published version. (Also, in an actual error, the BBC claimed that both groups of patients contained just over 100,000 people–but this is…
…[*I removed a section indicating that the full study had not been post, only the abstract. I was mistaken and have removed that section. I apologize for the error.] With…
…Professor Crawley blameless—a serious error, in my opinion—but nevertheless requested corrections to the ethics statements in all 11 papers. As readers of the Science for ME forum recently noted, only…
…not fully grasped that correcting this obvious error in one paper meant correcting it across the board. Who knows? No explanation for this unusual reversal was provided. In any event,…
By David Tuller *This post has been corrected. In the first sentence, I originally wrote in error that the open letter was sent to Cochrane on September 4th, not on…
