Trial By Error: Revisiting the Reuters Story
…frames as bad behavior and ignores the substance of the scientific issues involved. Here’s her account of the enormous range of concerns that I (and many others) have raised: His…
…frames as bad behavior and ignores the substance of the scientific issues involved. Here’s her account of the enormous range of concerns that I (and many others) have raised: His…
…involved. Here’s her account of the enormous range of concerns that I (and many others) have raised: His [Tuller’s] argument is that the therapies evaluated in the PACE trial are…
…working-age population in 2008€“2009.” Elsewhere, Bermingham et al refers to “our estimate that 10% of total healthcare expenditure for this age group [i.e the working-age population] is accounted for by…
…among the working-age population in England account for 11% of all National Health Service expenditures. As I documented, this statement–from a 2017 editorial published in the British Journal of General…
…should offer a full and transparent account of what went wrong. How did the paper pass peer review in the first place? Why has it taken so long for Archives…
…account of what went wrong and how it went wrong. In an effort to expedite action on this matter, I am cc-ing several people: Dr Fiona Godlee, editorial director of…