Bat SARS-like coronavirus: It’s not SARS 2.0!
…I pointed out above, both SCH014-MA15 and SCH104 are less virulent in mice than SARS-CoV, so this headline is completely wrong. An article in Sputnik International has the headline “Uncaging…
…I pointed out above, both SCH014-MA15 and SCH104 are less virulent in mice than SARS-CoV, so this headline is completely wrong. An article in Sputnik International has the headline “Uncaging…
…Re-Visiting My Questions for the Science Media Centre about Bristol’s LP Study June 3, 2019–Trial By Error: Time to Retract the LP Study; Letter to Archives of Disease in Childhood…
…paper on the potential of SARS-virus-like bat coronaviruses to cause human disease. The paper reawakened the debate on the risks and benefits of engineering viruses. Opponents of gain-of-function research began…
By David Tuller, DrPH Three weeks ago, Professor Racaniello e-mailed a letter of concern to Archives of Disease in Childhood about its recent study of the Lightning Process as a…
…virus alone does not promote infection and disease. Mosquito bites cause an infiltration of neutrophils (a type of white blood cell) into the bite site. The edema at the bite…
…unreliable as assessments of treatments for patients with more narrowly defined disease, and specifically those with the core symptom of post-exertional malaise. Yet members of the GET/CBT ideological brigades brandish…