…in response to something someone tweeted in one of these tweet-chains inspired by yet another Sharpe head-scratcher, a PACE critic referenced “the banality of evil”–the brilliant but exhausted Hannah Arendt…
…got back to normal, compared to those in the other study arms. [2] An accompanying Lancet commentary similarly claimed that these back-to-normal participants had met a strict criterion for recovery….
By David Tuller, DrPH Two months ago, Professor Racaniello sent Lancet editor Richard Horton an open letter about the indisputable methodological and ethical failings of the PACE trial. This was…
…tweet this week from Professor Sharpe that many considered offensive. He has since deleted it. This post includes the initial tweet as well as the open letter and Professor Sharpe’s…
…the GET/CBT ideological brigades from pressing that argument. Significantly, the HRA report focuses on the 2011 Lancet paper and ignores the 2013 “recovery” paper in Psychological Medicine. For that paper,…
…so she presumably endorsed the journal’s actions. The documented facts suggest that BMJ’s ethical compass is broken and that editors are more concerned about possible reputational damage than about the…
