…at Flinders University in Australia: I am concerned by the change in assessment method between the published results of the PACE trial and the trial protocol.¦In particular, the protocol stated…
…per the original protocol methods, or statistical analyses assessing the impact of the many mid-trial changes, or their actual trial data, they were able to hide their disastrous results for…
…with the MAGENTA trial report if that previous effort hadn’t been exposed. Instead of lying about the study’s peculiar feasibility-trial-into-full-trial design, they acknowledge it and concede that it is a…
…protocol). The investigators then publish their small randomized trial as a feasibility study for a new and bigger randomized trial, without disclosing in the paper that it did not start…
…this BMJ policy for feasibility trials that have been extended into full trials, much less trials in which outcome swaps occurred after more than half the participants had provided data….
…opponents? 10) During the same interview, you stated that the PACE trial had undergone “endless rounds of peer review.” Yet the trial was also fast-tracked to publication, as indicated on the version…
