…two additional blogs, here they are: https://www.virology.ws/2016/11/28/trial-by-error-continued-a-follow-up-post-on-fitnet-nhs/ https://www.virology.ws/2016/12/02/trial-by-error-continued-the-dutch-studies-again-and-an-esther-crawley-bonus/ Should you decide you want to respond, simply send your response to Dr. Racaniello. He will then give me a chance to…
…trial published in BMJ. On the contrary, the trial had null results for both of its primary outcomes–fatigue and physical function–at the one-year follow-up period. However, a post-hoc reanalysis of…
…is. (Of course, it’s important to remember that the Lightning Process study began as a feasibility trial.) Feasibility trials are by definition small. They aren’t designed to deliver authoritative and…
…similarities between PACE and the Dutch FITNET trial on which it is based. Like the PACE trial, the Dutch relied on a post-hoc definition of recovery. The thresholds the FITNET…
…his open letters. PACE was a poorly designed and executed clinical trial. Racaniello added this: The PACE trial illustrates exactly how NOT to conduct a clinical trial. My Columbia colleague,…
…Trial by Error because, well, I really like the name. And I think it accurately describes both the PACE trial specifically and the larger effort to impose the CBT/GET paradigm…
