…with a 2017 paper called “Clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Lightning Process in addition to specialist medical care for paediatric chronic fatigue syndrome: randomised controlled trial.” More than a year…
…by recruiting more than half the participants prior to trial registration, swapping outcomes based on the early results, and then deciding not to disclose these details in the published paper….
…trial.” (I came across this trial while reading Scott’s recent article, Ensuring IAPT Makes a Real World Difference, in the journal Mental Health in Family Medicine. Other references in Scott’s…
…of Mahana stock options was not in the disclosure for the study of the web-based program but in her disclosure for a separate trial for people with persistent physical symptoms….
…trial in which participants who did not receive the specialized seizure-reduction intervention showed a (not statistically significant) trend toward more improvement on the primary outcome than those who did receive the intervention. …
…in a fully powered randomised controlled trial.” Given the poor outcome results, why would they conduct a follow-up trial? Why would anyone provide them with more funding when they have…
