…is to a 2005 trial called “Adapting the randomized consent (Zelen) design for trials of behavioural interventions for chronic disease: feasibility study.” But that trial did not involve, or seek…
…a letter to Professor Trudie Chalder on which I cc’d you and several others. That letter concerned a major factual error in the first paragraph of the PRINCE trial protocol,…
…for Long Covid—“Post-Hospitalisation COVID-19 Rehabilitation (PHOSP-R): A randomised controlled trial of exercise-based rehabilitation,” in European Respiratory Journal. Zachary posted a comment on the blog requesting “corrections” for non-existent errors. I’ve…
By David Tuller, DrPH Last week, The Times ran an article about the open letter to The Lancet concerning the PACE trial, quickly followed by a piece in The BMJ….
By David Tuller, DrPH Same-Day Update: In re-reading the new paper, I noticed that the discussion section also features errors involving the percentages. It includes this sentence: “About 9% of…
…anyone should trust open-label trials with subjective outcomes, like FITNET-NHS, her online CBT trial for kids. When she discussed her recently published SMILE study of the cult-like Lightning Process, she…
