By David Tuller, DrPH Update: Lucibee has done what I didn't want to bother to do. Here's her annotated version of Professor Sharpe's statement: https://lucibee.wordpress.com/2018/07/02/sharpes-briefing-on-the-so-called-pace-trial-for-the-21-june-2018-westminster-hall-debate/ ********** Before last month's hearing in Westminster Hall, Professor Michael Sharpe sent the following briefing notes to Carol Monaghan MP. To anyone who knows the ...

By David Tuller, DrPH I recently wrote to Oxford University neuropsychologist Dorothy Bishop, who had provided a statement to the Science Media Centre about the Lightning Process study. Although she had expressed concerns about the pseudo-scientific nature of the intervention, she found it to be generally well conducted and noted ...

By Steven Lubet Steven Lubet is the Williams Memorial Professor at Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law, where he specializes in professional responsibility and ethics. Let€™s assume that everyone on the PACE team, and all of their colleagues in the biopsychosocial school, always acted in complete good faith. Let€™s agree ...

By David Tuller, DrPH This morning, Professor Racaniello sent the following e-mail to Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet. The subject heading: "Another open letter about the PACE trial." He cc'd the three lead PACE investigators and the public relations office at Queen Mary University of London. Virology Blog's previous ...

By David Tuller, DrPH Update: 6/26/18 When I wrote last week in the post below about Mike Godwin's intervention into the PACE debate, I mentioned that "a PACE critic" triggered the events by tweeting a reference to "the banality of evil”--the famous Hannah Arendt phrase that emerged out of her ...