David Tuller

Trial By Error: How Bristol Investigators Avoided Ethical Review

By David Tuller, DrPH I have written many posts about BMJ Open’s 2011 school absence study, which reported that school absence records could be useful in identifying children with chronic fatigue syndrome. However, for reasons not yet adequately explained, the investigators exempted the study from ethical review on the grounds that it qualified as “service …

Trial By Error: How Bristol Investigators Avoided Ethical Review Read More »

Trial By Error: An Australian Exchange with Professor Sharpe

By David Tuller, DrPH Below is an exchange between members of the Australian ME/CFS community and Professor Michael Sharpe. The open letter from patients and advocates was prompted by a tweet this week from Professor Sharpe that many considered offensive. He has since deleted it. This post includes the initial tweet as well as the …

Trial By Error: An Australian Exchange with Professor Sharpe Read More »

Trial By Error: The Psychosomatic Conference’s Pathetic Response

By David Tuller, DrPH *Please see note at end of post After I posted yesterday’s blog about Per Fink’s upcoming appearance at the fourth annual Columbia Psychosomatic Conference being held this weekend, I received the following e-mail from Columbia’s Alla Landa. She is an assistant professor of “clinical psychology in psychiatry”–whatever that means–and director of …

Trial By Error: The Psychosomatic Conference’s Pathetic Response Read More »

Trial By Error: Open Letter to The Lancet, version 3.0

By David Tuller, DrPH Two months ago, Professor Racaniello sent Lancet editor Richard Horton an open letter about the indisputable methodological and ethical failings of the PACE trial. This was a follow-up to Virology Blog’s 2016 open letter to Dr. Horton; the new one detailed what has happened since then. Last month, I re-sent and …

Trial By Error: Open Letter to The Lancet, version 3.0 Read More »

Trial By Error: My Exchange With Professor Bishop

By David Tuller, DrPH I recently wrote to Oxford University neuropsychologist Dorothy Bishop, who had provided a statement to the Science Media Centre about the Lightning Process study. Although she had expressed concerns about the pseudo-scientific nature of the intervention, she found it to be generally well conducted and noted that the findings appeared to …

Trial By Error: My Exchange With Professor Bishop Read More »

Trial By Error: An Open Letter to The Lancet, Two Years On

By David Tuller, DrPH This morning, Professor Racaniello sent the following e-mail to Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet. The subject heading: “Another open letter about the PACE trial.” He cc’d the three lead PACE investigators and the public relations office at Queen Mary University of London. Virology Blog’s previous open letter to The Lancet …

Trial By Error: An Open Letter to The Lancet, Two Years On Read More »

Scroll to Top