Author name: David Tuller

Trial By Error: My Letter to BMJ Paediatrics Open About Missing Peer Reviews for Crawley Paper

By David Tuller, DrPH I recently noted that BMJ Paediatrics Open did not publish the peer review history of a 2021 study from a team led by Professor Esther Crawley, Bristol University’s methodologically and ethically challenged pediatrician and grant magnet. The study (Clery et al) was titled “Qualitative study of the acceptability and feasibility of …

Trial By Error: My Letter to BMJ Paediatrics Open About Missing Peer Reviews for Crawley Paper Read More »

Trial By Error: If Professor Crawley’s ACT Study Was Peer Reviewed, Where Are the Peer Reviews?

By David Tuller, DrPH Yesterday, I wrote a blog about a just-published but already out-dated conference abstract from a team led by Professor Esther Crawley, Bristol University’s methodologically and ethically challenged pediatrician and grant magnet. After I tweeted about it, I heard from Naomi Harvey, a zoologist, who said she’d written to BJPsychOpen about the …

Trial By Error: If Professor Crawley’s ACT Study Was Peer Reviewed, Where Are the Peer Reviews? Read More »

Trial By Error: Professor Crawley Promotes Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for CBT Failures

By David Tuller, DrPH What is going on with Professor Esther Crawley, Bristol University’s methodologically and ethically challenged pediatrician and grant magnet? And why is she still disseminating misguided views about treatments for vulnerable children? Haven’t kids suffered enough from the discredited claims of the GET/CBT ideological brigades? Just last week, the East Kent Hospitals …

Trial By Error: Professor Crawley Promotes Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for CBT Failures Read More »

Trial By Error: A Letter About the Inflated Prevalence Rate of Functional Neurological Disorder

By David Tuller, DrPH I have recently written two posts (here and here) about how experts in functional neurological disorder (FND) have a tendency to assert prevalence rates that ignore their own diagnostic criteria. Today I sent a letter to the corresponding author of yet another paper that has similarly engaged in this problematic strategy. …

Trial By Error: A Letter About the Inflated Prevalence Rate of Functional Neurological Disorder Read More »

Trial By Error: Sometimes Good Things Happen Quickly, Even When It Involves the UK National Health Service

By David Tuller, DrPH The new ME/CFS guidelines from the UK’s National Institute of Health and Care Excellence, published last October, reversed the agency’s previous recommendations for graded exercise therapy and (curative) cognitive behavior therapy. While this change presented a welcome repudiation of the research and claims emanating from the GET/CBT ideological brigades, many regional …

Trial By Error: Sometimes Good Things Happen Quickly, Even When It Involves the UK National Health Service Read More »

Trial By Error: An FND Patient’s View–and More on Those Inflated Prevalence Rates

By David Tuller, DrPH In a post last week, I noted that experts in FND have a tendency to assert prevalence rates that ignore their own diagnostic criteria. Before offering further thoughts on that score, I want to make one point very explicit: I am in no way questioning whether people with the diagnosis have …

Trial By Error: An FND Patient’s View–and More on Those Inflated Prevalence Rates Read More »

Scroll to Top