Author name: David Tuller

Trial By Error: Professor White & Colleagues “Regret” Ignoring Null Results in GETSET Trial Follow-Up

By David Tuller, DrPH Last week, I wrote about the correction made to the “Highlights” section of the paper reporting the long-term follow-up results for the GETSET trial. (The trial was conducted by Professor Peter White, one of the three lead PACE investigators, and colleagues.)  I noted that this correction was not indicated or identified–a …

Trial By Error: Professor White & Colleagues “Regret” Ignoring Null Results in GETSET Trial Follow-Up Read More »

Trial By Error: Quartet of Trials Reveals Limitations of CBT for “Medically Unexplained Symptoms”

By David Tuller, DrPH A year ago, I wrote a post about how the biopsychosocial ideological brigades had completed a trifecta of major studies that investigated cognitive behavior therapy for a variety of so-called “medically unexplained symptoms” (MUS). As a group, the studies demonstrated the overall ineffectiveness of CBT as a treatment for this category …

Trial By Error: Quartet of Trials Reveals Limitations of CBT for “Medically Unexplained Symptoms” Read More »

Trial By Error: Journal Corrects “Highlights” of GETSET Paper; A Letter about Prof White’s GET Safety Paper

By David Tuller, DrPH I have pressed the Journal of Psychosomatic Research to correct a recent paper, “Guided graded exercise self-help for chronic fatigue syndrome: Long term follow up and cost-effectiveness following the GETSET trial.” The senior author is Professor Peter White. Now the journal has published a revised “Highlights” section of the paper that …

Trial By Error: Journal Corrects “Highlights” of GETSET Paper; A Letter about Prof White’s GET Safety Paper Read More »

Trial By Error: Lowenstein’s Guardian Opinion; Eliot Smith’s Post-NICE View; Tack’s Take on Blinding Study

By David Tuller, DrPH The Guardian has published a lot of nonsense about Long COVID and has provided a platform for people who argue that robust manly thoughts are the path to recovery. Of course, it also published George Monbiot’s powerful columns on the topic, including his rebuttal of silly accusations that he was triggering …

Trial By Error: Lowenstein’s Guardian Opinion; Eliot Smith’s Post-NICE View; Tack’s Take on Blinding Study Read More »

Trial By Error: Did the IBS Trial Really Show that Web-Based CBT Offered Significant Clinical Effectiveness?

By David Tuller, DrPH I wrote some posts last year about the ACTIB trial–a major study of telephone-delivered and web-delivered cognitive behavior therapy (TCBT and WCBT) for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Contrary to how the results have been framed by those with reputational and financial interests in promoting them, the study demonstrated that WCBT did …

Trial By Error: Did the IBS Trial Really Show that Web-Based CBT Offered Significant Clinical Effectiveness? Read More »

Trial By Error: Null Outcomes Presented as Success in Yet Another CBT Trial from Prof Trudie Chalder

By David Tuller, DrPH Trudie Chalder, a professor of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) at King’s College London, has recently published yet another high-profile paper: the main results for “efficacy” from a trial of CBT for patients with so-called “persistent physical symptoms” (PPS) in secondary care. As usual with this group of investigators, things haven’t turned …

Trial By Error: Null Outcomes Presented as Success in Yet Another CBT Trial from Prof Trudie Chalder Read More »

Scroll to Top