Structures of the spike from P2, a well studied virus of E. coli, and the choleraphage phi92 were determined. The spikes are built from three copies of a single protein (trimers). The trimers are indeed shaped like spikes: they are wider at one end and taper to a rather sharp tip (figure at right). The bulk of the spike is made up of alternating beta-strands which form a corkscrew-like beta-helix. The sharp tip is composed of three beta-hairpins which the authors say “come together like petals in a flower bud”.
To verify that these structures are those of the spike that is attached to the baseplate, the authors solved the structure of the phage particle by cryo-electron microscopy and image reconstruction. The image clearly shows the spike protruding from the base plate (figure below). The structures of the spike proteins solved by X-ray crystallography could then be computationally fitted in the correct location in the cryo-EM image of the baseplate.
These structures support the idea that the spike is a rigid needle that pierces the bacterial membrane and forms a channel through which the DNA can pass. An interesting question is how the DNA gets past the spike, which plugs the end of the tail tube. The authors believe that the spike is loosely attached to the tube and might be easily dissociated once it passes through the cell membrane. The spike of phage T4 can be dissociated at low pH, a condition that is found in the periplasm, the space between the inner and outer bacterial membranes.
There are distinct signatures of the spike structure that can be identified in proteins of other contractile injection systems, including diverse bacteriophages. They can also be found in bacterial type VI secretion systems, which are membrane complexes used to transport proteins outside of the cell. Once evolution builds a useful machine, it is often put to many diverse uses.
Browning, C., Shneider, M., Bowman, V., Schwarzer, D., & Leiman, P. (2012). Phage Pierces the Host Cell Membrane with the Iron-Loaded Spike Structure, 20 (2), 326-339 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2011.12.009