David Tuller
Trial By Error: My Letter to Author of CODES Commentary
By David Tuller
By David Tuller, DrPH Earlier today, I sent the following letter to Dr David Perez, a neurologist and psychiatrist at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. Dr Perez, an expert on functional neurological disorders, wrote a commentary for Lancet Psychiatry that accompanied the publication of the results for CODES, a major ...
Trial By Error: CODES Trial Commentary Promotes ‘Eminence-Based Medicine’
By David Tuller
By David Tuller, DrPH By all accounts, the recently published CODES trial was the most authoritative study to date of whether cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) was an effective treatment for so-called dissociative seizures--a point confirmed in a commentary accompanying the paper in Lancet Psychiatry. Unfortunately, the CODES investigators and the ...
Trial By Error: UK Funds Genetics Project; My Letter to CODES Investigators
By David Tuller
By David Tuller, DrPH UK Funding for Major Genetics ME Study Two of the UK's largest public funding agencies announced this week that they would provide £3.2 million (around $4 million at current rates) for a study that will analyze genetic material from as many as 20,000 people to search ...
Trial By Error: More Questions About CODES Trial of CBT for Seizures
By David Tuller
By David Tuller, DrPH [*In the last paragraph, I mistakenly referred to the CODES protocol rather than the CODES statistical analysis plan. I apologize for the error.] I have recently written about CODES, the high-profile clinical trial investigating whether cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) could reduce the frequency of dissociative seizures, ...
Trial By Error: BMJ Responds to Appeals About Norway’s CBT-Music Therapy Study
By David Tuller
By David Tuller, DrPH Earlier this week, I sent a nudge to Professor Imti Choonara, editor-in-chief of BMJ Paediatrics Open, and Fiona Godlee, editorial director of BMJ, about a problematic "feasibility study" published a few months ago. That followed a letter two weeks ago, to which I had not received ...
