David Tuller
Trial By Error: The 2018 PACE Reanalysis and the SMC’s Expert Appraisals
By David Tuller
By David Tuller, DrPH It has been almost two years since BMC Psychology published a key reanalysis of raw data from the PACE trial. Given the significance of this paper (of which I was the least important of seven co-authors), I figured it wouldn't hurt to highlight it again. The ...
Trial By Error: NIH Funding “Needs Life Support,” Says Jennie Spotila
By David Tuller
By David Tuller, DrPH Every year, Jennie Spotila deconstructs NIH funding on her Occupy M.E. blog. Last November 7, she crunched the numbers for the 2019 fiscal year, and the same day posted another blog with a more urgent message. I am re-posting that blog in full (a bit late), with ...
Trial By Error: The Danish ME Association’s Open Letter
By David Tuller
By David Tuller, DrPH The Danish ME Association has sent and posted the following open letter to "Danish health politicians," with a very impressive list of international signatories. It seemed important to give this letter wide circulation. (Note that footnotes 4 and 5 are linked to the names of two ...
Trial By Error: Some More Thoughts on Functional Neurological Disorder
By David Tuller
By David Tuller, DrPH Last week I wrote a post on some of the signs used to diagnose people with "functional neurological disorder" (FND)--the phrase that has largely supplanted "conversion disorder" to describe neurological symptoms with no identified organic cause. In that post, I should have been clearer that I ...
Trial By Error: My 2011 Exchange with White et al about Case Definition
By David Tuller
By David Tuller, DrPH My first exchange of views with the PACE authors involved the issue of case definition--the criteria used to identify the illness they called chronic fatigue syndrome. This exchange took place courtesy of The New York Times, not long after The Lancet published the results of the ...