By David Tuller, DrPH Members of the CBT/GET ideological brigades produce a gusher of dreck, and I don't bother commenting on most of their work. Life's too short. So it can be easy to lose sight of how flawed and truly awful each individual paper can be. But even among ...

By David Tuller, DrPH A few days ago, I wrote a post about yet another atrocious paper from Professor Trudie Chalder, this one called €œChronic fatigue syndrome and occupational status: a retrospective longitudinal study. Professor Chalder and her colleagues seem constitutionally incapable of writing anything that isn't marred by massive ...

By David Tuller, DrPH Same-Day Update: In re-reading the new paper, I noticed that the discussion section also features errors involving the percentages. It includes this sentence: "About 9% of individuals who were not working at baseline had returned to work at follow-up." And this one: "Further, 6% of those ...

By David Tuller, DrPHAnother Anti-Science Campaigner Takes Aim at NICE The anti-science zealots do not give up easily. Now Live Landmark, the Norwegian Lightning Process practitioner, has written an opinion piece blasting the new evidence-based guidelines for ME/CFS from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). I assume ...

By David Tuller, DrPH Adam Lowe, a patient, was one of five lay people on the committee pulled together by Britain's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to work on the new ME/CFS guideline. He and I spoke recently on Zoom about his role in the process. https://youtu.be/yAe4k8KG-ng