In episode 55 of the podcast “This Week in Virology”, the largest TWiV panel ever assembled takes on XMRV and chronic fatigue syndrome, 2009 chemistry Nobel prizes for ribosome structure, finding new poxvirus vaccine candidates, a brouhaha over leaked Canadian data on influenza susceptibility, and transmission of H1N1 influenza to a pet ferret.
Send your virology questions and comments (email or mp3 file) to twiv@microbe.tv or leave voicemail at Skype: twivpodcast. You can also send articles that you would like us to discuss to delicious and tagging them with to:twivpodcast.
6 thoughts on “TWiV 55: Mice lie, monkeys exaggerate”
BN
What does Relative Inactivity Index (RII) means in studies of influenza transmission in animals? How is it calculated and interpreted?
Relative inactivity index is a measure of the effect of influenza virus infection on an animal, e.g. ferret. It's calculated as follows: Σ(day 1 to day 7) [score + 1]n/Σ(day 1 to day 7) n, where n equals the total number of observations.
Viruses don't always kill – in fact most of the time they don't, a fact you would have learned by listening to TWiV 55.
David
Indeed I did. But that doesn´t make my statement false. Viruses do kill cells, do kill mice, do kill monkeys, and do kill humans; in the same way as in the statement “humans kill humans”. Neither your statement is false even though mice not always lie, and monkeys not always exaggerate!
David
Indeed I did. But that doesn´t make my statement false. Viruses do kill cells, do kill mice, do kill monkeys, and do kill humans; in the same way as in the statement “humans kill humans”. Neither your statement is false even though mice not always lie, and monkeys not always exaggerate!
What does Relative Inactivity Index (RII) means in studies of influenza transmission in animals? How is it calculated and interpreted?
Relative inactivity index is a measure of the effect of influenza
virus infection on an animal, e.g. ferret. It's calculated as follows:
Σ(day 1 to day 7) [score + 1]n/Σ(day 1 to day 7) n, where n equals the
total number of observations.
Mice lie, Monkeys exaggerate, Viruses…………….KILL??????
Viruses don't always kill – in fact most of the time they don't, a fact you would have learned by listening to TWiV 55.
Indeed I did. But that doesn´t make my statement false. Viruses do kill cells, do kill mice, do kill monkeys, and do kill humans; in the same way as in the statement “humans kill humans”. Neither your statement is false even though mice not always lie, and monkeys not always exaggerate!
Indeed I did. But that doesn´t make my statement false. Viruses do kill cells, do kill mice, do kill monkeys, and do kill humans; in the same way as in the statement “humans kill humans”. Neither your statement is false even though mice not always lie, and monkeys not always exaggerate!