When giant viruses were discovered – with genomes much larger than any previously seen – some suggested that they had descended from a fourth domain of life (the current three are bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes). Part of the reason for such a claim was the finding of homologs of bacterial and eukaryotic genes, including molecules involved in translation. Analysis of new giant viruses encoding even more components of the translation machinery has thrown cold water on the fourth domain hypothesis.
Klosneuvirus, with a 1.57 million base pair DNA genome, was discovered in a wastewater treatment plant in Austria, and three related viruses – Indivirus, Hokovirus, and Catovirus – were found in environmental samples. Sequence analyses suggests that these viruses should be classified in a subfamily of the Mimiviridae.
The Klosneuviruses encode far more components of the translational machinery than do mimiviruses – 25 tRNAs, 19 aminoacyl tRNA synthetases, 11 initiation and elongation proteins, a chain release factor, and tRNA modifying enzymes.
Phylogenomic analyses demonstrate that the aminoacyl tRNA synthetase and translation factor genes are likely derived from protists. This finding is not compatible with the hypothesis that these viruses are derived from a fourth domain of life. It is more likely that smaller ancestors of giant viruses acquired these genes from known eukaryotes.
Why these components of the translational system have been maintained in these giant virus genomes is an excellent question. They might confer some advantage to the viruses, for example when host translation is shut off as a viral defense. Having components of the translational apparatus might allow viral protein synthesis to proceed.
Note that genes encoding ribosomal RNAs or proteins have not been found in any virus. In fact no virus encodes a complete protein synthesis machinery. Maybe they have yet to be discovered? Or perhaps these energetically costly activities are best left to the cell?
Wow seems like a new super virus is found! Great work done in the area of virology.
Thanks for bringing up this paper. However, although they have found genes (protein synthesis) that belong to protists, and although it might be true that the similar genes in other Mimiviruses have origin in amoebas, it does not
necessarily exclude viruses as the forth domain of life. In my opinion, just the opposite, indicate that viruses indeed are the 4th domain of life (but possibly never had ribosomes); as you pointed out: “Or perhaps these energetically costly activities are best left to the cell?”
Pingback: Forget the fourth domain of life – Virology
Pingback: viruses | [Veterinary and Medical Sciences